動画レッスン：The big history of Ukraine and corn

The big history of Ukraine and corn

ウクライナととうもろこしの歴史


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2l1yEcOYbI&t=51s

 

Today, a war in Ukraine means tens of thousands of people in Yemen face starvation.

How did we get here?

How did our global systems of food production become so complex and intertwined?

 

Well, for starters, Ukraine produces 16 percent of global maize exports. Thanks to globalization, the food we eat often comes from or is dependent on faraway places. Unfortunately, the more complex the system gets, the fragile it becomes.

 

All this complexity might seem very recent but it’s the product of a long history.

About 10,000 years ago, people living in southern Mexico gradually began developing this crop. In every society it touched, maize transformed the ways that people lived.

Europeans transported maize across oceans, where new societies adopted and adopted the crop to suit their needs. Millions of people began to rely on it. Today we grow more maize than any other grain. Why? Because there’s corn in everything. We use it for food, in biofuels and ethanol fuel, and all sorts of plastics.

 

As inclusion of maize in varied products has increased in complexity, so has its fragility. If there is a disruption in the supply of maize, dozens of industries in hundreds of countries would falter. As we see to build more resilient systems, maize offers many solutions and challenges.

Our food systems today are incredibly complex and fragile, and corn Is a big part of the long history that brought us here. The decisions we make today about how we grow and how we use corn will be crucial to our future as a species.

コメント

コメントを投稿

このブログの人気の投稿

Practical English メニュー

Practical English Lesson Menu  この4年間ワールドトークで講師をさせて頂く中で、多くの方が共通して疑問に思っていることについて私の肌感覚で共有させていただきます。 2024年4月、こちらのページで紹介中のメニュー、内容を一部改訂しました。現在受講中の皆様にはすこしわかりにくくなり、申し訳ありません。最近こちらのコースの需要が増えている中でよりわかりやすく、有用な内容をお伝えするために追加、変更した項目があります。レッスン継続中の方の既習、未習の内容につきましては私の方で管理しておりますので安心して引き続きレッスンをご予約下さい。 辞書や参考書には書かれていないことが大部分かもしれませんが、私が実際に使ったり聞いたりして「これが自然」だという内容でお伝えします。疑問に思うようなことはどんどん質問してください☆ 最終更新日：2024年4月11日 ①　I thinkを繰り返さないために ②　Because　理由をいう時の表現にバリエーションを持たせる ☆　現在完了で話す時と過去形で話す時 ☆　現在完了進行形はいつ使う？継続中？完了？ ☆　一番使う分詞構文 ☆　仮定法はなぜ使う？ ☆　「挑戦する」チャレンジに違和感 ③「見る」の表現いろいろ使い分け ④「連絡する」の表現 ⑤「じゃあまたね」って何て言う？ ⑥「よろしくお願いします」「お疲れ様です」何て言う？ ⑦「しなければならない」の表現いろいろ使い分け ⑧　感情を表現するときの受動態 ⑨「多分」はmaybeでよいの？ ⑩　While, during, before, afterを使って話す ⑪　オンラインレッスンやオンライン会議で使える表現 ⑫「言う」の表現いろいろ使い分け ⑬　相づちとFillar words：会話を途切れさせないために ⑭「確認する」の表現 ⑮　willとbe going toは一緒？ ⑯　"could"はいつ使う？ ⑰　随所に出てくる"get"を整理しよう ⑱　場所の前置詞 inとat、toとforの謎を解く ⑲　時間の前置詞 in, at, on, forの謎を解く ⑳　「私もです」So do I 使えていますか? ㉑　よく聞く"you know", "kind of", "lik
続きを読む

動画レッスン：The push for made-in-America chips

Worker shortage? The push for made-in-America chips 動画レッスン：米国半導体産業再生へ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6UMnvewHuU   The push for made-in-America chips   The US ‘ s plan to outrun China has one big missing factor: people.   This is a site in Ohio where Intel is building one of the most advanced semi-conductor production facilities on the planet. The project costs 20 billion dollars and though the bulk of the money is entails, some of it will come from the government which is throwing 52 billion dollars in subsidies of the semiconductor industry.   It’s part of the flood of money the government is directing towards industry investment in a plan to outrun China and retain economic superiority in the 21 st century. But it will take 7000 construction workers to build the plant and three thousand operators. Not only can Intel not find enough workers to operate the plant, it can’t even find enough construction workers to build it.   Intel isn’t alone. America is struggling to find assembly l
続きを読む

Reading material: 02 More parking fee for larger cars?

https://www.wisdomsq.com/contents/bepod/20230703.html More parking fee for larger cars? Parking is always being a critical element in cityscapes. The vast expenses of parking lot areas in places like Walmart or within the housing projects illustrates its importance. But there is a new issue in parking landscape with two possible solutions. The dilemma: how can city officials implement varying parking charges for different cars to increase revenue while maintaining fairness for car owners? Solution one: What about charging more for cars that emit more pollutants ? It seems sensible considering global focus on climate change. Solution two: What about if we charge larger, heavier vehicles more because they consume more parking space? Both these ideas are being tested worldwide. In the UK, for example, driving a fossil fuel power dirty car in cities like London or Dublin means you'll be paying through the nose . Your parking fee would be double compared to eco-friendly vehicles.
続きを読む