Reading material: 03 "Natural Aptitude or Diligence: Which Holds More Weight?

https://www.wisdomsq.com/contents/bepod/20230710.html#google_vignette

"Natural Aptitude or Diligence: Which Holds More Weight?

「生まれつきの適性」と「勤勉さ」：どちらが重要か？


A famous inventor, Thomas Edison said "Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration". In essence, success comes mainly from hard work. But is hard work more important than natural talent? The debate continues.

First, let's clarify the terms. Talent is a natural ability to do something well. Hard work involves time, effort and commitment. BBC future's research shows that people with natural talent gain more respect than those who succeed through hard work.

HR recruiters might even prefer talented candidates over more qualified ones. However, the importance of hard work shouldn't be understated. Science Fiction writer, Olivia Butler said habit is persistence in practice. In other words, success is often a result of hard work.

A study by a researcher at Arcadia University shows that the preference for talent over hard work is not always the case and depends on the job. Talent might be preferred for roles which require individual brilliance while hardworking individuals are favorite for team-oriented roles.

Indeed, talent can give you a foot in a door, but it's hard work that leads you to a greater success. To give you the final word, the ability to work hard and determination to succeed can also be seen as a form of a talent.

inventor

inspiration

perspiration

clarify

candidate

understate

persistence

brilliance

team-oriented

determination






コメント

コメントを投稿

このブログの人気の投稿

Practical English メニュー

Practical English Lesson Menu  この4年間ワールドトークで講師をさせて頂く中で、多くの方が共通して疑問に思っていることについて私の肌感覚で共有させていただきます。 2024年4月、こちらのページで紹介中のメニュー、内容を一部改訂しました。現在受講中の皆様にはすこしわかりにくくなり、申し訳ありません。最近こちらのコースの需要が増えている中でよりわかりやすく、有用な内容をお伝えするために追加、変更した項目があります。レッスン継続中の方の既習、未習の内容につきましては私の方で管理しておりますので安心して引き続きレッスンをご予約下さい。 辞書や参考書には書かれていないことが大部分かもしれませんが、私が実際に使ったり聞いたりして「これが自然」だという内容でお伝えします。疑問に思うようなことはどんどん質問してください☆ 最終更新日：2024年4月11日 ①　I thinkを繰り返さないために ②　Because　理由をいう時の表現にバリエーションを持たせる ☆　現在完了で話す時と過去形で話す時 ☆　現在完了進行形はいつ使う？継続中？完了？ ☆　一番使う分詞構文 ☆　仮定法はなぜ使う？ ☆　「挑戦する」チャレンジに違和感 ③「見る」の表現いろいろ使い分け ④「連絡する」の表現 ⑤「じゃあまたね」って何て言う？ ⑥「よろしくお願いします」「お疲れ様です」何て言う？ ⑦「しなければならない」の表現いろいろ使い分け ⑧　感情を表現するときの受動態 ⑨「多分」はmaybeでよいの？ ⑩　While, during, before, afterを使って話す ⑪　オンラインレッスンやオンライン会議で使える表現 ⑫「言う」の表現いろいろ使い分け ⑬　相づちとFillar words：会話を途切れさせないために ⑭「確認する」の表現 ⑮　willとbe going toは一緒？ ⑯　"could"はいつ使う？ ⑰　随所に出てくる"get"を整理しよう ⑱　場所の前置詞 inとat、toとforの謎を解く ⑲　時間の前置詞 in, at, on, forの謎を解く ⑳　「私もです」So do I 使えていますか? ㉑　よく聞く"you know", "kind of", "lik
続きを読む

動画レッスン：The push for made-in-America chips

Worker shortage? The push for made-in-America chips 動画レッスン：米国半導体産業再生へ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6UMnvewHuU   The push for made-in-America chips   The US ‘ s plan to outrun China has one big missing factor: people.   This is a site in Ohio where Intel is building one of the most advanced semi-conductor production facilities on the planet. The project costs 20 billion dollars and though the bulk of the money is entails, some of it will come from the government which is throwing 52 billion dollars in subsidies of the semiconductor industry.   It’s part of the flood of money the government is directing towards industry investment in a plan to outrun China and retain economic superiority in the 21 st century. But it will take 7000 construction workers to build the plant and three thousand operators. Not only can Intel not find enough workers to operate the plant, it can’t even find enough construction workers to build it.   Intel isn’t alone. America is struggling to find assembly l
続きを読む

Reading material: 02 More parking fee for larger cars?

https://www.wisdomsq.com/contents/bepod/20230703.html More parking fee for larger cars? Parking is always being a critical element in cityscapes. The vast expenses of parking lot areas in places like Walmart or within the housing projects illustrates its importance. But there is a new issue in parking landscape with two possible solutions. The dilemma: how can city officials implement varying parking charges for different cars to increase revenue while maintaining fairness for car owners? Solution one: What about charging more for cars that emit more pollutants ? It seems sensible considering global focus on climate change. Solution two: What about if we charge larger, heavier vehicles more because they consume more parking space? Both these ideas are being tested worldwide. In the UK, for example, driving a fossil fuel power dirty car in cities like London or Dublin means you'll be paying through the nose . Your parking fee would be double compared to eco-friendly vehicles.
続きを読む